Modern Kingdoms

Introduction

Within the nature that moves as a whole, communities with different beliefs and purposes emerged. The steps that led to crossroads resulted in outcomes that were often similar. Some discoveries regarding the perception of power were divine, while others stemmed from the misuse of nature's offerings.

Every choice in nature is fundamentally connected to a divine force. Nevertheless, most centralized governments appoint their own leaders. To maintain balance in nature, some leaders can open the way for better choices through divine support. Exceptional mystical (natural) cases occur when negative aspects within governance systems cannot find a positive resolution.

Every being in nature exists for the equal use of all living things. Cycles of natural disasters and diseases repeat to restore balance in power perceptions. Leaders who take responsibility earn more respect and, over time, attempt to sustain their existence through what nature has offered. In reality, all living beings share equal responsibility.

Forms of Governance and Transformation Processes

Monarchy: Leadership within the core family remains concentrated in a single ruler as the family grows over time. It is a form of governance that prevents better choices and the mental development of society. Traditional behaviors are displayed to maintain the leader's perceived importance, as negative actions carried out by leaders are intended to remain unknown or misunderstood. It leads to more chaos and conflict; diseases and natural disasters occur more frequently.

Oligarchy: When the necessary balance within a monarchy cannot be maintained, oppressed groups eventually appoint their own leaders. As a result of these groups' pursuit of rights, the number of stakeholders around resources increases. The respect attributed to monarchic leaders transforms into protection of reputations among different groups. Similar chaos and conflicts continue within the management of these groups.

Theocracy: Political governance is essentially a monarchy or an oligarchy, just continued through divine interpretations.

Republic/Democracy, which is not yet practically implemented in any country, is a form of government where sovereignty belongs to the people.

Modern Kingdoms

All countries that appear democratic today are oligarchic systems formed after the fall of monarchies. To maintain balance in nature, leaders in different groups change or new groups emerge. No country yet exists where resources and opportunities are shared equally. Therefore, a truly democratic country has not been established yet.

Different strategies are developed based on various beliefs to conceal the fact that a state's money belongs to all its citizens. After past monarchies collapsed, resources were transferred to certain groups and new companies were established. In modern republic governance systems, political decisions appear to be made through political parties, while economic sanctions continue to be distributed across different companies.

Different sectors include distracting elements to divert attention from the main focus. Each company or group is expected to appoint its own leader. Therefore, every community essentially represents an organ of the oligarchic system. Economic conflicts between companies keep society occupied. Issues that must be debated and developed politically are divided into organizations such as associations or foundations, keeping citizens away from politics.

There is always a global economic system. Major companies in any country maintain strategic relationships with other countries. Conscious wars instigated by kingdoms, past and present, are only one of the tricks used to eliminate domestic rivals. After wars, resource allocations continue in various and similar ways. Some rulers fail and are forced to transfer governance to other kingdoms.

Each company in the current system actually represents a kingdom of different scale within the global oligarchy.

The subsistence struggles of different groups continue under the control of various kingdoms. Conflicts between companies have negative effects on society. Similar to primitive reputation protection methods from the monarchical era, the general sovereignty and health of society are suppressed to protect the reputations of companies and groups. Since each company and group structurally belongs to an oligarchic system, they feel compelled to share similar concerns about reputation. This forms a deeply insidious marketing strategy at the foundation level.

I wish all of us a future where we can live in countries whose governance is truly democratic. 🌍